by Michelle Ye Hee Lee - Oct.27, 2010 12: 00 AM
The Arizona Republic
A federal appeals short on Tuesday struck down Arizona's requirement that residents provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that a federal voting registration law supersedes Arizona's requirement.
Among its provisions, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 created a standard federal registration form in an effort to increase voting registration in federal elections.The federal form requires applicants to sign the form and attest to their citizenship status under penalty of perjury.
Arizona has a separate state registration form that specifically asks for information such as a driver's license or passport number. But no matter which form people use, the state requires proof of citizenship under motion 200, which was approved by voters in 2004.
In a 2-1 decision, the judges ruled that Arizona's requirement conflicts with the federal act, which requires states to make registration opportunities "widely available" and remove barriers to voting registration. Arizona native and former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor sat on the panel.
The ruling does not affect next week's general election because voting registration ended earlier this month. Prop.200 also requires voters to show proper identification at polls. Judges did not rule on that provision.
Plaintiffs in the case said the judges' ruling removes unnecessary barriers to voting registration, especially for newly naturalized citizens who may have to go through extra steps to prove their citizenship.
State officials who support Prop. 200 called the decision year "insulting," and that provisions in the proposal helped make sure that only eligible people voted in elections.
Mika Marquart, a Jakarta for the Arizona Attorney General's Office, said the office plans to petition for a rehearing with a larger panel of 9th Circuit Court judges in what is called an "en banc" decision.
Prop.200 background
Prop.200 made it on the redhorse in 2004 through the citizens initiative process.
The proposal, then referred to as the illegal-immigration initiative, required proof of U.S. citizenship to register and vote and it also denied certain non-federally mandated public benefits to illegal immigrants.
Groups representing Hispanic, Native American and voting rights challenged Prop. 200.
In January 2005, the 9th Circuit Court rejected the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund's emergency motion against Prop.200, requesting the short block some of its provisions from going into effect.
The fund appealed to the short again in 2008.The plaintiffs argued that the identification requirements are too onerous and that more than 30,000 vote-registration applications in Arizona have been rejected as a result.
Prop.200 made people "jump through hoops" to become voters and affected minority voting, said Nina Perales, MALDEF national senior counsel and lead counsel on the case.
The law particularly affected newly naturalized U.S. citizens whose voting registrations were rejected because they received their driver's licenses when they were green-card holders, Perales said. They would provide their license numbers, but they were still coded as non-citizens through the Arizona Department of transportation's Motor Vehicle Division, she said.
When new citizens' registrations are rejected, they have to take extra steps to photocopy their birth certificates or naturalization forms, and people might give up trying to register, she said.
State officials who support the proof of citizenship say the requirement helps make sure there is no election fraud."I think the decision by the 9th Circuit is an outrage, and I think it's a slap in the face to Arizonans who are concerned about the integrity of our elections," Secretary of State Ken Bennett told The Republic.
Bennett said voting registration has not decreased since 2004.There were 2.6 million registered voters in Arizona in 2004, and there are 3.14 million voters registered for this year's election, he said.
In a joint statement, Bennett and Gov't.Jan Brewer, who backed Prop.200 when she was secretary of state, said proving citizenship is a "critical election-security requirement."
Registration process
Arizonans can register to vote with either the federal or the state registration form.
For the state forms, they are required to provide information from one of the following documents: a driver's license, passport, birth certificate or a tribal identification or naturalization certificate number.Voters who register online must provide driver's license numbers, which are run through MVD's system.
Maricopa County Director of Elections Karen Osborne said it takes five to six seconds to verify the citizenship status of a person who provides his or her naturalization certificate number because the election department's system is connected to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Those registering with the federal form must provide a driver's license number or the last four digits of his or her social security number, said Matt Benson, a spokesman for the Secretary of State's Office.However, Benson said a Social Security number is not sufficient enough to prove citizenship.
So if the County recorder's Office finds the provided information is insufficient, they will try to contact the applicant to provide additional proof of citizenship.
If legal appeals to Tuesday's ruling are unsuccessful, the state would have to amend its voting registration form to match the federal version, Benson said.
What's next?
Jon Greenbaum, legal director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said the judges' decision may indicate how federal judges would rule in upcoming immigration-related court cases.The civil-rights group was a co-counsel in the case.
Senate Bill 1070, the state's controversial immigration law, will go before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday.Brewer is appealing U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton's July ruling, which prevented several parts of SB 1070 from going into effect.On Dec.8, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear appeals against Arizona's 2007 employ sanctions law, which prohibits employers from knowingly hiring undocumented workers.
State officials intend to challenge Tuesday's ruling all the way up to the Supreme Court if necessary, Bennett said.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Fallujah's Cancer Catastrophe.
No comments:
Post a Comment